• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Another Train Hits Objects On Line

Deepgreen

Established Member
Joined
12 Jun 2013
Messages
6,442
Location
Betchworth, Surrey
Couldn't see this one so far. This one relates to trees dumped on the line near Penkridge. Fly-tipping reaches a new low...

"Rail travel between Stafford and Wolverhampton has been disrupted due to a train hitting illegally dumped trees on the line near Penkridge, according to Network Rail.
They said nobody was hurt and the line has since reopened.
They urged passengers to check before they travel as services are reinstated.
A Network Rail spokesperson said: “We won’t tolerate the railway being used as an illegal dumping ground and will do everything we can to catch those responsible and bring them to justice.”
They added: “We urge anyone who sees fly-tipping happening on the railway to immediately contact the British Transport Police.” "

 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

skyhigh

Established Member
Joined
14 Sep 2014
Messages
5,527
The title you've chosen is a bit of a click bait headline. I'm not sure Network Rail can be blamed for fly tipping, unlike the previous events.
 

atillathehunn

Established Member
Joined
6 Jan 2010
Messages
1,440
Location
NL
The title you've chosen is a bit of a click bait headline. I'm not sure Network Rail can be blamed for fly tipping, unlike the previous events.
Where does the title blame Network Rail? Of either the thread or the article?
 

Boodiggy

Member
Joined
8 Nov 2012
Messages
593
Location
MK
The incident was gardening waste from behind a row of houses thrown over the fence
 

Deepgreen

Established Member
Joined
12 Jun 2013
Messages
6,442
Location
Betchworth, Surrey
The title you've chosen is a bit of a click bait headline. I'm not sure Network Rail can be blamed for fly tipping, unlike the previous events.
Sorry, no 'click-baiting' was intended and I didn't mention any organisation or blame, apart from the fly-tipper(s).
 

skyhigh

Established Member
Joined
14 Sep 2014
Messages
5,527
Where does the title blame Network Rail? Of either the thread or the article?
The 'another' part made me think it was going to be something that had been left on the line by NR, as happened last week.

Sorry, no 'click-baiting' was intended and I didn't mention any organisation or blame, apart from the fly-tipper(s).
To be fair it's probably just my interpretation :lol:
 

19Gnasher69

Member
Joined
1 Jul 2021
Messages
59
Location
Aire Valley
“A Network Rail spokesperson said: ‘We won’t tolerate the railway being used as an illegal ground and will do everything we can to catch those responsible and bring them to justice.”
They added: “We urge anyone who sees fly-tipping happening on the railway to immediately contact the British Transport Police’.”

Given the states of linesides across the country it can be tacitly accepted that Network Rail DOES tolerate the railway being used as a dumping ground. Cuttings present the greatest problem, particularly where housing backs on to them. It shouldn’t be beyond the wit of NR or the BTP to establish the offending parties, even if temporary cctv has to be erected.
 

pokemonsuper9

Established Member
Joined
20 Dec 2022
Messages
1,827
Location
Greater Manchester
“A Network Rail spokesperson said: ‘We won’t tolerate the railway being used as an illegal ground and will do everything we can to catch those responsible and bring them to justice.”
They added: “We urge anyone who sees fly-tipping happening on the railway to immediately contact the British Transport Police’.”

Given the states of linesides across the country it can be tacitly accepted that Network Rail DOES tolerate the railway being used as a dumping ground. Cuttings present the greatest problem, particularly where housing backs on to them. It shouldn’t be beyond the wit of NR or the BTP to establish the offending parties, even if temporary cctv has to be erected.
There is a LOT of junk by the tracks on my line (there's a lot of space spare as well, since there were once 4 tracks).
I can't imagine it being easy to prevent.
 

Snow1964

Established Member
Joined
7 Oct 2019
Messages
6,566
Location
West Wiltshire
Given the states of linesides across the country it can be tacitly accepted that Network Rail DOES tolerate the railway being used as a dumping ground. Cuttings present the greatest problem, particularly where housing backs on to them. It shouldn’t be beyond the wit of NR or the BTP to establish the offending parties, even if temporary cctv has to be erected.
This one should be fairly obvious if look for tree stumps or recently cut branches, assuming they weren't carried far before throwing them.

The real danger comes if they were on Network Rail land, and trees overhung boundary, as overhang can be cut, but the branches/timber must be returned (ie thrown back over the fence towards the railway) to trees owner
 

43066

Established Member
Joined
24 Nov 2019
Messages
9,679
Location
London
It seems strange that fly-tippers would target the railway in such a way that a collision is caused; surely it’s in their interests to be as discrete as possible.
 

The exile

Established Member
Joined
31 Mar 2010
Messages
2,871
Location
Somerset
It seems strange that fly-tippers would target the railway in such a way that a collision is caused; surely it’s in their interests to be as discrete as possible.
As Snow1964 says it is actually possible (though highly unlikely) that someone was not only acting within the law, but doing exactly what the law requires them to do. Doesn’t excuse all the building rubble, broken furniture etc - not to mention the abandoned track panels etc. Oh, hang on…
 

Deepgreen

Established Member
Joined
12 Jun 2013
Messages
6,442
Location
Betchworth, Surrey
The 'another' part made me think it was going to be something that had been left on the line by NR, as happened last week.


To be fair it's probably just my interpretation :lol:
Hard to see how this could be misinterpreted so severely...

There is a LOT of junk by the tracks on my line (there's a lot of space spare as well, since there were once 4 tracks).
I can't imagine it being easy to prevent.
Somehow your quote above has removed the word 'dumping' before "ground".

It seems strange that fly-tippers would target the railway in such a way that a collision is caused; surely it’s in their interests to be as discrete as possible.
Or even 'discreet' (different meaning)...

There is a LOT of junk by the tracks on my line (there's a lot of space spare as well, since there were once 4 tracks).
I can't imagine it being easy to prevent.
However, I imagine the dumping must have been on the remaining track in order for a train to hit it.
 

pokemonsuper9

Established Member
Joined
20 Dec 2022
Messages
1,827
Location
Greater Manchester
However, I imagine the dumping must have been on the remaining track in order for a train to hit it.
I will be very surprised if a train ever hits fly tipped junk on my line given how much space there is, however I can definitely see it happening on a fuller area like the West Coast Main Line
 

Deepgreen

Established Member
Joined
12 Jun 2013
Messages
6,442
Location
Betchworth, Surrey
I will be very surprised if a train ever hits fly tipped junk on my line given how much space there is, however I can definitely see it happening on a fuller area like the West Coast Main Line
Sorry, I misread your previous comment which I thought was about the Penkridge incident.
 

SCDR_WMR

Established Member
Joined
17 Dec 2017
Messages
1,594
I will be very surprised if a train ever hits fly tipped junk on my line given how much space there is, however I can definitely see it happening on a fuller area like the West Coast Main Line
The stretch it happened on is quite narrow, and is around a bend from the station (could see the network rail high vis' from the platform).

Also, I belive it was 730 210 and 730 211 that struck the tree. Fortunately no damage to the units as they were running today.
 

Top