• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Class 701 'Aventra' trains for South Western Railway

Clarence Yard

Established Member
Joined
18 Dec 2014
Messages
2,509
I think you missed the sarcasm

I did and others would have done as well. Then it gets repeated by someone as fact and so on. When I am being sarcastic on social media, I usually use italics, which is in some places referred to as “sarcastic font”.

Anyway, nice to see that 701501 has re-emerged. What we now want to see emerging is a mass train crew training programme.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

MDB1images

Member
Joined
9 Jun 2018
Messages
656
OK, back to the serious stuff !!
Which 701s have not yet been delivered to SWR, I make it the following:
701017 701501 701502 at Worksop. 701001 701058 701060 701503 701504 at Derby. 701003 at Wembley.
In addition to these 701007 701008 have been delivered and returned, now at Worksop, 701005 has been delivered and returned, now at Derby.
Of all of these 701001 seems to have taken the lowest profile and I have not seen it mentioned for ages - I assume it is at Derby but it could possibly be elsewhere.
Any comments on any of this would be useful.
Realise this is an update from February, but has anyone got a latest state of play on which Class 701's have yet to be delivered and which ones have entered service.
 

Stephen42

Member
Joined
6 Aug 2020
Messages
252
Location
London
Sorry if this has been explained before, but what exactly does this mean?
It indirectly means SWR have now accepted those units.

The longer version is the financing Rock Rail uses is secured against the rolling stock, via a charge giving the lender preferred status on that asset if Rock Rail were to go bust. Rock Rail unless they've contracted poorly will use the same terms for acceptance as SWR to avoid the manufacturer leaving them with stock they can't lease, so it basically means SWR must view them as acceptable based on their contract with Rock Rail. You can't put a charge against something the company doesn't own and the rolling stock is usually legally the manufacturers until accepted. It doesn't necessarily mean they are immediately ready for public service, as some requirements may not be part of the terms for acceptance e.g. software mods.
 

PG

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
2,880
Location
at the end of the high and low roads
Sorry if this has been explained before, but what exactly does this mean?
Much like a bank does when they fund a house purchase. In order to protect their funds they raise a charge against the house which must be discharged (by repaying the funds) before the house can be sold. In relation to the 701s Rock Rail South Western = a bank; the 701s = a house.
 

Snow1964

Established Member
Joined
7 Oct 2019
Messages
6,419
Location
West Wiltshire
The following additional units have had charges raised by Rock Rail South Western

701020/021/055/505/506/513/514
I think the list of charges is now

004, 006, 009, 011, 012, 013, 014, 015, 016, 017, 018, 019, 020, 021, 022, 023, 024, 025, 026, 027, 028, 029, 030, 031, 032, 033, 034, 035, 036, 037, 038, 039, 040, 041, 042, 043, 044, 045, 046, 047, 048, 049, 050, 051, 052, 053, 054, 055, 056, 505, 506, 507, 508, 509, 510, 511, 512, 513, 514, 515, 516

Missing units :
001, 002, 003, 005, 007, 008, 010, 057, 058, 059, 060
501, 502, 503, 504, 517-530

49 of 60 10car and 12 5car,
so 550 of 750 (73.33%) vehicles accepted


EDIT must be missing one as there are 65 charges (1 general, 1 simulators, 1 spares, and thus 62 trains)
 
Last edited:

DMckduck97

Member
Joined
26 Jul 2020
Messages
179
Location
England
043 is on a bit of a roll, as no 1 unit is the same surely now is the best time to get some of the other units accepted to have a go, no?
 

Invincible

Member
Joined
23 Apr 2022
Messages
444
Location
Surrey
Much like a bank does when they fund a house purchase. In order to protect their funds they raise a charge against the house which must be discharged (by repaying the funds) before the house can be sold. In relation to the 701s Rock Rail South Western = a bank; the 701s = a house.
Isn't it a bit more complicated?
From my post #8662

How a 200-year-old British industry reached the end of the line

"no payments due until the trains actually enter service"

If I get this right Rock Rail South Western PLC is a subsidiary of Gillemot Investments who have brought the 540 vehicles from Alstom
But SWR (First/MTR) and DfT are only currently paying the lease from Rock Rail South Western PLC for the 4 (or 5) 701s in service? (and SWR currently pay the low leasing costs for the old 455s)
Once all 750 vehicles go in service Gillemot Investments (and shareholders) should make a good long term profit
 
Last edited:

Peter Mugridge

Veteran Member
Joined
8 Apr 2010
Messages
14,897
Location
Epsom
A friend on board 701 043 who was hoping to get the 11.33 departure from Waterloo has advised it has just become the second ever in service failure, with a door fault, after two reboot attempts taking 30 minutes.
 

norbitonflyer

Established Member
Joined
24 Mar 2020
Messages
2,509
Location
SW London
A friend on board 701 043 who was hoping to get the 11.33 departure from Waterloo has advised it has just become the second ever in service failure, with a door fault, after two reboot attempts taking 30 minutes.
The third, I think. On both March 15th and 28th it only managed to come out to play in time for the second round trip.

701043 was the culprit each time.

MTIN now c2,600.
 
Last edited:

Class93

Member
Joined
4 May 2023
Messages
46
Location
London
A friend on board 701 043 who was hoping to get the 11.33 departure from Waterloo has advised it has just become the second ever in service failure, with a door fault, after two reboot attempts taking 30 minutes.
Not bad for an appauling entry into service - maybe the issue wasn’t ever with the trains..
 

Stephen42

Member
Joined
6 Aug 2020
Messages
252
Location
London
Isn't it a bit more complicated?
From my post #8662

How a 200-year-old British industry reached the end of the line

"no payments due until the trains actually enter service"

If I get this right Rock Rail South Western PLC is a subsidiary of Gillemot Investments who have brought the 540 vehicles from Alstom
But SWR (First/MTR) and DfT are only currently paying the lease from Rock Rail South Western PLC for the 4 (or 5) 701s in service? (and SWR currently pay the low leasing costs for the old 455s)
Once all 750 vehicles go in service Gillemot Investments (and shareholders) should make a good long term profit
The article is incorrect, SWR have been paying lease costs since October 2020. They only pay for ones they have accepted which was 3 until mid 2022, whether or not they are used for passenger services doesn't matter.
 
Joined
2 Jun 2023
Messages
228
Location
Richmond
I've noticed that the 701s have a unique motor deceleration sound that none of the other Aventras have, something you often hear on light rail systems.
Listen to the two videos at the timestamp, it's the two tone beep noise.
 
Last edited:

D365

Veteran Member
Joined
29 Jun 2012
Messages
11,503
I've noticed that the 701s have a unique motor deceleration sound that none of the other Aventras have, something you often hear on light rail systems.
Listen to the two videos at the timestamp, it's the two tone beep noise.
Could that be related to the fact that none of the other Aventra fleets operate on 750V DC?
 

Nicholas Lewis

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2019
Messages
6,184
Location
Surrey
The article is incorrect, SWR have been paying lease costs since October 2020. They only pay for ones they have accepted which was 3 until mid 2022, whether or not they are used for passenger services doesn't matter.
Correct which is why DafT should be leaning on SWR to get them into use as there now footing the bill for two lots of trains.
 
Joined
2 Jun 2023
Messages
228
Location
Richmond
It'll be odd seeing the 701s be repainted so early into their life if Labour do their rail plan of having everything under the same brand
 

D365

Veteran Member
Joined
29 Jun 2012
Messages
11,503
Yes, if so we've found the first notable different between the motor sounds. Everything else is identical to AC sound wise
I hasten to add that, as with other train classes, it’s not the three phase motors that sound different. It’s the traction electronics which are ’overlaid’ on the motor sound.
 

Top